san_visa
06-01 02:21 PM
Is there a option to track the I-140 status on the USCIS website using Application Receipt Number ?
Thanks,
San
Thanks,
San
wallpaper Short hair cuts 2009
dsneyog
01-03 08:47 PM
I have 1-485 pending (my husband is main applicant for our greencard application).
I entered US last time using Advanced parole and I was working on EAD then. What should be my
1. Manner of Entry
2. Current immigration Status
I thought it's supposed to be Parolee with 1-485 pending. But only related drop down menu I cans see is PAR:Parolee. Is that what I should select?
I tried to find this in existing thread but could not find it. I will appreciate your help with this.
Thanks a lot.
I entered US last time using Advanced parole and I was working on EAD then. What should be my
1. Manner of Entry
2. Current immigration Status
I thought it's supposed to be Parolee with 1-485 pending. But only related drop down menu I cans see is PAR:Parolee. Is that what I should select?
I tried to find this in existing thread but could not find it. I will appreciate your help with this.
Thanks a lot.
glus
04-30 08:19 AM
If you can't show you have had 3 years of experience at the time the labor was filed...you will most likely have hard times getting I140 approved.....the service centers are very thorough regarding work experience.
I am not an attorney.
G
I am not an attorney.
G
2011 Women Hairstyles
dealsnet
07-30 12:34 PM
THERE ARE 3 DIFFRENT TREADS ON THIS.
READ IT.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=20496&page=2
READ IT.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=20496&page=2
more...
ashkrish
06-13 09:37 AM
Hello all, my Labor Cert was filed in late 2004 under the RIR regime. Was later "re-filed" under PERM in Oct. 2005. I am an EB-2 candidate (Indian citizen).
The DOL denied the application for Labor Certification filed under PERM recommending that the requirements for the position offered include the phrase " any suitable combination of education, training and experience is acceptable" The denial offers both the option of filing a motion to reconsider and refiling the application with the amended requirements. The law firm hired by my employer has filed a "motion to reconsider". In addition they are in the process of re-filing the application with the amended requirements. My question is-how quickly (from your experience) does the DOL take to respond to the motion to reconsider (my lawyers referenced a memo sent out earlier this year from the DOL in which a 3-4 month timeframe was mentioned).
Thanks
The DOL denied the application for Labor Certification filed under PERM recommending that the requirements for the position offered include the phrase " any suitable combination of education, training and experience is acceptable" The denial offers both the option of filing a motion to reconsider and refiling the application with the amended requirements. The law firm hired by my employer has filed a "motion to reconsider". In addition they are in the process of re-filing the application with the amended requirements. My question is-how quickly (from your experience) does the DOL take to respond to the motion to reconsider (my lawyers referenced a memo sent out earlier this year from the DOL in which a 3-4 month timeframe was mentioned).
Thanks
mailsunnydeol
08-06 02:06 PM
I received an email from USCIS on my I-485 - 08/03/09.
It said "Card Production Ordered"
How long does it actually take to receive the green card by mail after this message?
It said "Card Production Ordered"
How long does it actually take to receive the green card by mail after this message?
more...
franklin
08-13 02:12 AM
Me too
AP approved on 6/13, LUD on 8/12 (a Sunday)
I assume to was a system update only and nothing more than that
There a re quite a few other affected in the same way http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=4856&page=151
AP approved on 6/13, LUD on 8/12 (a Sunday)
I assume to was a system update only and nothing more than that
There a re quite a few other affected in the same way http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=4856&page=151
2010 2009 men hairstyle.
arnab221
06-26 01:02 PM
bumping up
more...
e3visa
04-26 09:19 AM
The E-3 visa holder can hold mutiple jobs and the E-3 visa holder from practical application be sponsored for a green card as well by their employer.
hair 2009 Trendy ob hairstyle
franklin
05-04 11:07 AM
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=4327
it was put in members only section for you
Ah - thanks Pappu :)
it was put in members only section for you
Ah - thanks Pappu :)
more...
simplequestion
03-15 09:18 AM
I am trying set up an appointment for the last week of April (Apr 27-May 1) in Matamoros, Mexico and came across the following website about their wait times:
http://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/wait/tempvisitors_wait_result.php?post=Matamoros&x=46&y=12
For Matamoros, it says
Typical Wait Time (Calendar Days*) for a Nonimmigrant Visa Interview Appointment
Visitors Visas: 15 Days
Student/Exchange Visitors Visas *** (Excludes: A, G, K, and V): 15 Days
All Other Nonimmigrant Visas: 15 Days
Typical Wait Time (Workdays**) for a Nonimmigrant Visa To Be Processed****: 28 Days
1) Does it mean that I can setup my H1-B Visa Appointment only before 15 days of Apr 27th?
2) What does Typical Wait Time (Workdays**) for a Nonimmigrant Visa To Be Processed****: 28 Days mean? Does it mean that it will typically take 28 days to get Visa stamping after your interview?
Thanks
http://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/wait/tempvisitors_wait_result.php?post=Matamoros&x=46&y=12
For Matamoros, it says
Typical Wait Time (Calendar Days*) for a Nonimmigrant Visa Interview Appointment
Visitors Visas: 15 Days
Student/Exchange Visitors Visas *** (Excludes: A, G, K, and V): 15 Days
All Other Nonimmigrant Visas: 15 Days
Typical Wait Time (Workdays**) for a Nonimmigrant Visa To Be Processed****: 28 Days
1) Does it mean that I can setup my H1-B Visa Appointment only before 15 days of Apr 27th?
2) What does Typical Wait Time (Workdays**) for a Nonimmigrant Visa To Be Processed****: 28 Days mean? Does it mean that it will typically take 28 days to get Visa stamping after your interview?
Thanks
hot Trendy Hairstyles for Long
iAlien
06-13 02:36 PM
My 7th year H1-B renewal was mailed by my lawyer on March 30th to the Vermont Serice Center. They received it on March 31st. I know that there was a change in filing taking effect April 1st. What happened in my case is that the USCIS forwarded my files to the California Service Center without receipting it first. California reveiced my file on April 4th and now I find myself out of status. My lawyer tries to tell me that it was an USCIS mistake whereas a lawyers who I retained for a second opinion tells me it was the mistake of the first attorney. I did everything possible for the to reconsider their decision but I still would like to know who's to blame. If it was indeed the lawyera mistake I'm considering filing a complaint against him.
more...
house Hairstyle Trends 2009
Macaca
12-12 10:27 AM
Pelosi vows more civil approach � next year (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1207/7335.html) By Jim VandeHei and John F. Harris | The Politico, Dec 12, 2007
Across the ideological spectrum, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has dashed expectations.
On the right, the hope was that Pelosi would be the tallest lightning rod in Washington � playing to type as a �San Francisco liberal� and handing the Republican minority all manner of ideological openings to exploit. For the most part, that has not happened.
On the left, the hope was that Pelosi would lead the newly empowered Democrats to hijack President Bush�s agenda on the issue that matters most to party activists � ending the Iraq war.
To Pelosi�s regret, that has not happened either.
Appraisals of Pelosi�s first year revolve around these fallen hopes and come with still another surprise: For all her history-making status as the first woman to run the House, Pelosi has emerged as a fairly conventional leader.
This is partly to her credit.
She has run a highly disciplined operation, keeping a potentially fractious caucus unified on tough issues.
And she has restrained some of her own instincts representing one of the nation�s most liberal districts.
With a couple of prominent exceptions, she has not handed Republicans opportunities to exploit impolitic statements or legislative maneuvers.
But conventionality has come at a steep cost.
Few members of either party, when speaking privately, argue that what Congress needs most is a change of party with a continuation of the highly partisan status quo.
In many ways, that�s what Pelosi represents.
Democrats bridled at being marginalized under 12 years of Republican rule, but Pelosi has treated turnabout as fair play.
Bending a promise made to voters in the last election, the speaker has shut Republicans out of many debates by limiting their ability to offer alternative ideas on the House floor and made only modest attempts to engage Republicans on many issues, notably Iraq.
This represents a probably accurate calculation about what�s necessary to keep her own party cohesive.
But polarized government has also thwarted some of Pelosi�s own objectives.
The first of those is forcing Bush to end the war. �All of the good things that we did, which were, I mean, astounding � are eclipsed by the war in Iraq,� she said in a Politico interview.
She added that she has been surprised by Democrats� inability to peel off GOP dissenters.
�If I had to say one thing that I would have appraised differently � it would have been that I would not have expected the Republicans in Congress to stick with the president on this war this long,� she said. �Not from their personal statements to us privately or the public mood in their own districts.�
The inability to resolve the Iraq debate or tackle the other most pressing issues is one reason the number of people saying they disapprove of the performance of Congress � at 70 percent in some recent surveys � has risen 15 to 20 points or more since the start of the year.
Pelosi acknowledged she and her leadership team could have done better at managing expectations.
�Maybe we should have been thinking about how we were communicating with the public more,� she said. �Maybe I should have from the start just established what we were doing instead of having to be responsive to the press about �somebody said this, they thought you were doing that,� because this place is a total rumor mill.�
Even so, Pelosi made clear that she is fine with drawing sharp, partisan lines when necessary.
�I certainly want my speakership to be distinguished by a level of civility and bipartisanship when that�s possible,� she said. �That is what I hope to do in this next year, I really do.�
But as for this year? �I had a job to get done this year,� she said. �I had a decision to make; I had to remove obstacles to getting a job done.�
She got it done, at times.
Early in the session, Democrats moved their �six for �06� package promised in the previous election. That included raising the minimum wage, enacting homeland security upgrades and reducing student loan rates.
They also helped their members by pushing for more spending on children�s health care, a political no-brainer for many members, and demanding that Congress offset the cost of new spending with spending cuts or revenue increases elsewhere.
Along the way, the elegantly styled speaker, a grandmother of seven, proved herself a steel magnolia � a self-confident leader who projected strength in a way that caused powerful subordinates to defer to her.
Even Vice President Cheney complimented (in a distinctly backhanded way) her leadership, noting he was surprised that such old Democratic bulls of the House as Reps. John P. Murtha of Pennsylvania and John Dingell of Michigan seem to follow her lead.
�They are not carrying the big sticks I would have expected,� Cheney told Politico.
�There�s a woman who runs that place with an iron hand,� Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid told Politico in an interview. �I am sure that some people are a little disappointed [that] this diminutive, very attractive woman is bowling people over � men and women.�
Pelosi has succeeded in part by having her own team of old bulls, such as Rep. George Miller of California, and younger bulls, such as Rep. Rahm Emanuel of Illinois, on her team.
What is sometimes called a weakness � a penchant for micromanaging, for instance � has helped tighten her grip and enhance her standing.
She has muffed up on a few high-profile occasions. A trip to Syria earlier this year was ridiculed by Republicans as clumsy, freelance diplomacy.
She was forced by her Democratic colleagues to quit pushing for the Armenian genocide resolution because it was clearly complicating U.S. relations with Turkey.
The final verdict on her handling of the Iraq debate awaits the year ahead � whether Democrats can either force a change in policy or make Republicans pay a heavy price in the 2008 elections.
For now, the best grade Pelosi can get is incomplete: Democrats have had no substantive success in changing policy.
One what-if echoes. Some members say Democrats missed a golden opportunity early in the summer to find compromise and split Republicans from Bush, laying the groundwork for limits on the military operation.
Pelosi instead pursued an unyielding approach that turned off even the war skeptics inside the GOP.
In a sign of the pressures Pelosi is under, however, it is the anti-war liberals in her own party who offer the harshest assessment of the Pelosi reign so far.
�When you look back at this year, it will be defined as the year of lost opportunities,� said Ohio Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich, a long-shot presidential candidate. �This was the time to use the power of the majority to chart a new direction. So far it�s been � not only a missed opportunity but a failure.�
California Rep. Lynn Woolsey added: �I personally don�t think [the strategy] worked. As a result, everything we�ve done on student loans, minimum wage, the six in �06 agenda gets lost.�
By one standard, however, Pelosi can look back on 2007 as a clear success. Her party is as well-organized, and her own position within it more secure, at year�s end compared with year�s start.
�I am not going to let one issue blow up this caucus,� she said. �We always strive for unity.�
Across the ideological spectrum, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has dashed expectations.
On the right, the hope was that Pelosi would be the tallest lightning rod in Washington � playing to type as a �San Francisco liberal� and handing the Republican minority all manner of ideological openings to exploit. For the most part, that has not happened.
On the left, the hope was that Pelosi would lead the newly empowered Democrats to hijack President Bush�s agenda on the issue that matters most to party activists � ending the Iraq war.
To Pelosi�s regret, that has not happened either.
Appraisals of Pelosi�s first year revolve around these fallen hopes and come with still another surprise: For all her history-making status as the first woman to run the House, Pelosi has emerged as a fairly conventional leader.
This is partly to her credit.
She has run a highly disciplined operation, keeping a potentially fractious caucus unified on tough issues.
And she has restrained some of her own instincts representing one of the nation�s most liberal districts.
With a couple of prominent exceptions, she has not handed Republicans opportunities to exploit impolitic statements or legislative maneuvers.
But conventionality has come at a steep cost.
Few members of either party, when speaking privately, argue that what Congress needs most is a change of party with a continuation of the highly partisan status quo.
In many ways, that�s what Pelosi represents.
Democrats bridled at being marginalized under 12 years of Republican rule, but Pelosi has treated turnabout as fair play.
Bending a promise made to voters in the last election, the speaker has shut Republicans out of many debates by limiting their ability to offer alternative ideas on the House floor and made only modest attempts to engage Republicans on many issues, notably Iraq.
This represents a probably accurate calculation about what�s necessary to keep her own party cohesive.
But polarized government has also thwarted some of Pelosi�s own objectives.
The first of those is forcing Bush to end the war. �All of the good things that we did, which were, I mean, astounding � are eclipsed by the war in Iraq,� she said in a Politico interview.
She added that she has been surprised by Democrats� inability to peel off GOP dissenters.
�If I had to say one thing that I would have appraised differently � it would have been that I would not have expected the Republicans in Congress to stick with the president on this war this long,� she said. �Not from their personal statements to us privately or the public mood in their own districts.�
The inability to resolve the Iraq debate or tackle the other most pressing issues is one reason the number of people saying they disapprove of the performance of Congress � at 70 percent in some recent surveys � has risen 15 to 20 points or more since the start of the year.
Pelosi acknowledged she and her leadership team could have done better at managing expectations.
�Maybe we should have been thinking about how we were communicating with the public more,� she said. �Maybe I should have from the start just established what we were doing instead of having to be responsive to the press about �somebody said this, they thought you were doing that,� because this place is a total rumor mill.�
Even so, Pelosi made clear that she is fine with drawing sharp, partisan lines when necessary.
�I certainly want my speakership to be distinguished by a level of civility and bipartisanship when that�s possible,� she said. �That is what I hope to do in this next year, I really do.�
But as for this year? �I had a job to get done this year,� she said. �I had a decision to make; I had to remove obstacles to getting a job done.�
She got it done, at times.
Early in the session, Democrats moved their �six for �06� package promised in the previous election. That included raising the minimum wage, enacting homeland security upgrades and reducing student loan rates.
They also helped their members by pushing for more spending on children�s health care, a political no-brainer for many members, and demanding that Congress offset the cost of new spending with spending cuts or revenue increases elsewhere.
Along the way, the elegantly styled speaker, a grandmother of seven, proved herself a steel magnolia � a self-confident leader who projected strength in a way that caused powerful subordinates to defer to her.
Even Vice President Cheney complimented (in a distinctly backhanded way) her leadership, noting he was surprised that such old Democratic bulls of the House as Reps. John P. Murtha of Pennsylvania and John Dingell of Michigan seem to follow her lead.
�They are not carrying the big sticks I would have expected,� Cheney told Politico.
�There�s a woman who runs that place with an iron hand,� Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid told Politico in an interview. �I am sure that some people are a little disappointed [that] this diminutive, very attractive woman is bowling people over � men and women.�
Pelosi has succeeded in part by having her own team of old bulls, such as Rep. George Miller of California, and younger bulls, such as Rep. Rahm Emanuel of Illinois, on her team.
What is sometimes called a weakness � a penchant for micromanaging, for instance � has helped tighten her grip and enhance her standing.
She has muffed up on a few high-profile occasions. A trip to Syria earlier this year was ridiculed by Republicans as clumsy, freelance diplomacy.
She was forced by her Democratic colleagues to quit pushing for the Armenian genocide resolution because it was clearly complicating U.S. relations with Turkey.
The final verdict on her handling of the Iraq debate awaits the year ahead � whether Democrats can either force a change in policy or make Republicans pay a heavy price in the 2008 elections.
For now, the best grade Pelosi can get is incomplete: Democrats have had no substantive success in changing policy.
One what-if echoes. Some members say Democrats missed a golden opportunity early in the summer to find compromise and split Republicans from Bush, laying the groundwork for limits on the military operation.
Pelosi instead pursued an unyielding approach that turned off even the war skeptics inside the GOP.
In a sign of the pressures Pelosi is under, however, it is the anti-war liberals in her own party who offer the harshest assessment of the Pelosi reign so far.
�When you look back at this year, it will be defined as the year of lost opportunities,� said Ohio Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich, a long-shot presidential candidate. �This was the time to use the power of the majority to chart a new direction. So far it�s been � not only a missed opportunity but a failure.�
California Rep. Lynn Woolsey added: �I personally don�t think [the strategy] worked. As a result, everything we�ve done on student loans, minimum wage, the six in �06 agenda gets lost.�
By one standard, however, Pelosi can look back on 2007 as a clear success. Her party is as well-organized, and her own position within it more secure, at year�s end compared with year�s start.
�I am not going to let one issue blow up this caucus,� she said. �We always strive for unity.�
tattoo trendy asian short hairstyles
nixstor
03-06 03:50 PM
There are some companies that offer 100/0. Why not join them? :)
more...
pictures 2009 trendy hairstyle for
ras
06-13 03:29 PM
Here is a scenario:
Previous I 140 (EB2 PD Sept 2005) approved and is now current
Current I 485 filed based on another I 140 with PD in Dec 2006.
Can port over to the previous I 140 and can make I 485 current. The issue here is still unmarried so would like to hold on for few months to port over the PD.
Do you see an issue if porting is not done from EB2 Dec 2006 to the PD in EB2 Sept 2005?
How does it work if married after 3-6months and then want to port the PD for the spouse as well? Does Previous I 140 PD current still hold good?
If retrogression occurs once again do u still need to wait to port and get Green Card
Previous I 140 (EB2 PD Sept 2005) approved and is now current
Current I 485 filed based on another I 140 with PD in Dec 2006.
Can port over to the previous I 140 and can make I 485 current. The issue here is still unmarried so would like to hold on for few months to port over the PD.
Do you see an issue if porting is not done from EB2 Dec 2006 to the PD in EB2 Sept 2005?
How does it work if married after 3-6months and then want to port the PD for the spouse as well? Does Previous I 140 PD current still hold good?
If retrogression occurs once again do u still need to wait to port and get Green Card
dresses Women:Haircuts 2011 trendy
natrajs
08-13 10:23 PM
My I - 140 was filed in TSC and approved and I-485 also sent to TSC
more...
makeup Trendy Haircuts 2011 Men.
gc_perm2k6
03-11 07:50 PM
They have a petition to be signed. Should we sign? IV Core members, please advice.
girlfriend trendy hairdos.
s416504
11-04 11:20 AM
I think answer is NO if you want to come back of L1A from B employer.
To be eligible for L1A, You need to be on outside USA payroll from B employer for atleast 1 year (from past 3 years).
With H1B, you will be on USA's payroll for that period.
To be eligible for L1A, You need to be on outside USA payroll from B employer for atleast 1 year (from past 3 years).
With H1B, you will be on USA's payroll for that period.
hairstyles trendy hairstyle 2009.
bnmreddy
02-02 04:48 PM
bump
theflash
01-27 06:10 PM
This is cool, now only if jelly fish could move and its tentacles follow it that would be awesome.
Atpugkeviv
12-12 05:45 PM
Dear Lawyer,
I had filed I 485 in EB3 category in July 2007 and my priority date is November 2006. I want to start the process under EB2 category also. My organization is very big and will not bend any rules to accomodate anything. There is a job posted in my organization with the following requirements -
Required Qualifications
A Bachelor's degree or equivalent training in Business Administration, Health Service Administration, Mathematics, Project Management or Industrial Engineering.
Five or more years of progressive experience in an exempt-level business analyst, project management or process improvement role.
My question to you is whether this job requirement classify this job in EB 2 category? Thanks.
I had filed I 485 in EB3 category in July 2007 and my priority date is November 2006. I want to start the process under EB2 category also. My organization is very big and will not bend any rules to accomodate anything. There is a job posted in my organization with the following requirements -
Required Qualifications
A Bachelor's degree or equivalent training in Business Administration, Health Service Administration, Mathematics, Project Management or Industrial Engineering.
Five or more years of progressive experience in an exempt-level business analyst, project management or process improvement role.
My question to you is whether this job requirement classify this job in EB 2 category? Thanks.
