WAIT_FOR_EVER_GC
07-12 03:12 PM
wednesday or friday :) :)
ok you win :) :)
ok you win :) :)
wallpaper Wholesale WWE Randy Orton RKO
bbct
02-17 05:05 PM
Today, I filed an official complaint with IRS about this employer. They told, they are going to send a notice asking the employer to reply to the tax bearer within 10 days from the receipt of the letter. I don't know how the employer is going to react and if they would still provide a corrected W2. Hoping, they would provide, otherwise I would have to call IRS again after another 2 weeks time. I had to be on the phone line for almost 30 mins to reach the IRS customer representative. It is a real pain.
siravi
11-20 04:42 PM
got it--just followed abhijitp's thread. Thanks.
2011 WWE Legend Killer Randy Orton
GCKaMaara
04-07 12:59 PM
Thank you.
I really see useless threads a ton here, some of them are opened by these guys. They might be helping this organization by donating some money , that does not mean they can dictate terms. I will say these guys motives will not help any one.
I would consider this type of threads and discussions worth only if they are created by regular members.
I don't like someone create a new handle come here and post something without filling profile, start arguing with other members and run away when isolated.
The best way to deal with these guys are to avoid them.
I really see useless threads a ton here, some of them are opened by these guys. They might be helping this organization by donating some money , that does not mean they can dictate terms. I will say these guys motives will not help any one.
I would consider this type of threads and discussions worth only if they are created by regular members.
I don't like someone create a new handle come here and post something without filling profile, start arguing with other members and run away when isolated.
The best way to deal with these guys are to avoid them.
more...
immitul
10-02 10:14 AM
We are doing the same...of keeping some amount aside for unexpected events, and then invest further on house or some thing else.
the_jaguar
09-20 11:11 AM
here is a simple suggestion...
how about a chance for a free giveaway, like a 15 minute session with a lawyer for free. This could be done in 2 ways.
Referral mode: For every x member that any existing member brings in, he/she gets x minutes with the lawyer for free.
Sweepstakes mode: Every new member coming has a chance to get y free minutes with the lawyer. Make this y a bigger than x.
I am guessing, there will be lotsa people who would like to consult immi lawyers with their immi questions, and a free consultation would be a sufficient motivator :)
how about a chance for a free giveaway, like a 15 minute session with a lawyer for free. This could be done in 2 ways.
Referral mode: For every x member that any existing member brings in, he/she gets x minutes with the lawyer for free.
Sweepstakes mode: Every new member coming has a chance to get y free minutes with the lawyer. Make this y a bigger than x.
I am guessing, there will be lotsa people who would like to consult immi lawyers with their immi questions, and a free consultation would be a sufficient motivator :)
more...
raysaikat
01-15 12:12 PM
Thank you so much for your responses! I did not mean to lie to the consulate when I answered "no" on the form the previous time. I think the thing that we've actually came back in time proves it.
This is not a valid reasoning. The "no" is not related to immigration intent. It is related to if you made factually correct statements.
The new DS-160 form doesn't have this questions because I've heard that many people were confused by it. The consulate officer did not ask us if we were planning to immigrate to the US. I know of quite a few people who were issued a non-immigrant visa while replying "yes" to that question. Does it mean the law was broken on that case?
Does it matter if the "I-130" was not approved yet? Does it count "immigration intent" from the date they've received documents from my brother? Please comment. Thank you.
You need to *prove* that you have no intention for immigrating to US. Your intention is within your head; it does not start from any given date or given action by USCIS. The IO needs to "read your mind". The legal standard is that the court concedes that no one can know for sure what one's intentions are, however, the immigration officer can make a reasonable guess at the intentions by observing the actions you took or someone else took on your behalf.
In your case:
1. Someone filed I-130 for you. This is for permanent immigration to US.
2. You have family ties in US.
3. You have traveled to US before (I do not know how frequently).
4. You want to join a university that does not even have your major; that too you do not know what exactly you will study in that university. This itself is a very strong indication (at least in my mind) that you are not really interested in the education, but you applied to that university just for coming to US.
All together, it shows a clear pattern of observable evidence that your intention is to immigrate to US.
This is not a valid reasoning. The "no" is not related to immigration intent. It is related to if you made factually correct statements.
The new DS-160 form doesn't have this questions because I've heard that many people were confused by it. The consulate officer did not ask us if we were planning to immigrate to the US. I know of quite a few people who were issued a non-immigrant visa while replying "yes" to that question. Does it mean the law was broken on that case?
Does it matter if the "I-130" was not approved yet? Does it count "immigration intent" from the date they've received documents from my brother? Please comment. Thank you.
You need to *prove* that you have no intention for immigrating to US. Your intention is within your head; it does not start from any given date or given action by USCIS. The IO needs to "read your mind". The legal standard is that the court concedes that no one can know for sure what one's intentions are, however, the immigration officer can make a reasonable guess at the intentions by observing the actions you took or someone else took on your behalf.
In your case:
1. Someone filed I-130 for you. This is for permanent immigration to US.
2. You have family ties in US.
3. You have traveled to US before (I do not know how frequently).
4. You want to join a university that does not even have your major; that too you do not know what exactly you will study in that university. This itself is a very strong indication (at least in my mind) that you are not really interested in the education, but you applied to that university just for coming to US.
All together, it shows a clear pattern of observable evidence that your intention is to immigrate to US.
2010 Randy Orton RKO on Evan Bourne
.jpg "wonder whether Randy Orton")
GCAmigo
02-08 09:48 AM
Does anyone know when March bulletin comes out...
anyway you can check this link..
http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_1360.html
anyway you can check this link..
http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_1360.html
more...
perm2gc
10-03 06:59 PM
I have two passports one with H4 Visa stamped and another Surname changed. While entering US, I have used my name as in the Visa (new surname) in the I-94 card.
I have applied for H1B with new surname in this May and change of Status with that I-94.
During H1 processing, I have travelled out of US and while entering back I have used old surname( as sometime back DMV ppl told that the name on I-94 should match with H4 Visa)
Now I got H1 approval and COS approval with my middle name taken as first name and new surname.
1) First thing is, the I-94 on COS approval and I-94, currently present in my Passport does not match.
2) First name and middle name are interchanged in the passport and H1 approval.
Is this going to create any problem while applying SSN? What are the possible consequences..
Also, any similar scenarios, plz respond..
Are we confused or you...
you said that you entered on new surname passport and so your i94 will have new surname..
now when again you reentered you entered on old h4 with old surname...
so you have entered US with two different surnames ...
DMV told you correctly..always your surname should match the surname in visa stamp...
you are lucky that immigration officer at port of entry might have overlooked your case..otherwise you must be in your home country by now..
you are in a serious trouble..surname issue is very big..consult a good attroney than posting in the board...
Good Luck!!!
I have applied for H1B with new surname in this May and change of Status with that I-94.
During H1 processing, I have travelled out of US and while entering back I have used old surname( as sometime back DMV ppl told that the name on I-94 should match with H4 Visa)
Now I got H1 approval and COS approval with my middle name taken as first name and new surname.
1) First thing is, the I-94 on COS approval and I-94, currently present in my Passport does not match.
2) First name and middle name are interchanged in the passport and H1 approval.
Is this going to create any problem while applying SSN? What are the possible consequences..
Also, any similar scenarios, plz respond..
Are we confused or you...
you said that you entered on new surname passport and so your i94 will have new surname..
now when again you reentered you entered on old h4 with old surname...
so you have entered US with two different surnames ...
DMV told you correctly..always your surname should match the surname in visa stamp...
you are lucky that immigration officer at port of entry might have overlooked your case..otherwise you must be in your home country by now..
you are in a serious trouble..surname issue is very big..consult a good attroney than posting in the board...
Good Luck!!!
hair Other Formats. $5.00
eb3_nepa
06-20 09:57 AM
stucklabor,
Thanks for your post. It's good to hear the perspective of a core member of IV like yourself. I understand your point of view but respectfully disagree with your definition of the greatest good. The greatest good will not be achieved by just passing the labor cert. stage. The greatest good is achieved once we have the GC card. Your effort on retrogression to benefit 250k & 200k is plausible. But you help them to pass one bridge, to just get stuck on the next. If there are 25k people stuck in name check at this time, imagine what will happen when the estimated 200k-250k reach that stage.
If the 25k spent in average 3 years in the name check, what will be the wait time for that massive population that are headed that way after retrog & labor cert? The EB process is a big picture and the greatest number will not get the greatest good until all these obstacle are resolved all the way to the end.
sroym, i think the point stucklabor was trying to make is, that currently most of the people are stuck in retrogression and labour which makes things far more unbearable than actually having an EAD/AP and such benefits. There is a whole thread on this discussion where members of all nationalities have complained about IV not taking the FBI name check issue seriously. I think the moot point that IV core members are focussing on is, the fact that retrogression is making life unbearable for just about everyone. Plus given the following facts:
1) A Serious Majority of the IV members are affected more by retrogression+labor as compared to FBI name checks. and
2) IV core members have full time jobs and spouses and are working pro-bono for the good of everyone and money collected is also coming in slowly and thorugh the IV members themselves.
These 2 facts mean that both time and money is at a premium and they have to spend it solving the problem they originally started to solve. Believe me, some of the core members themselves are stuck with the FBI name check issue for the past 2 years or so.
Given all these facts, you have to understand where IV and it's mission/policy stands. To my understanding the policy is "One step at a time".
Thanks for your post. It's good to hear the perspective of a core member of IV like yourself. I understand your point of view but respectfully disagree with your definition of the greatest good. The greatest good will not be achieved by just passing the labor cert. stage. The greatest good is achieved once we have the GC card. Your effort on retrogression to benefit 250k & 200k is plausible. But you help them to pass one bridge, to just get stuck on the next. If there are 25k people stuck in name check at this time, imagine what will happen when the estimated 200k-250k reach that stage.
If the 25k spent in average 3 years in the name check, what will be the wait time for that massive population that are headed that way after retrog & labor cert? The EB process is a big picture and the greatest number will not get the greatest good until all these obstacle are resolved all the way to the end.
sroym, i think the point stucklabor was trying to make is, that currently most of the people are stuck in retrogression and labour which makes things far more unbearable than actually having an EAD/AP and such benefits. There is a whole thread on this discussion where members of all nationalities have complained about IV not taking the FBI name check issue seriously. I think the moot point that IV core members are focussing on is, the fact that retrogression is making life unbearable for just about everyone. Plus given the following facts:
1) A Serious Majority of the IV members are affected more by retrogression+labor as compared to FBI name checks. and
2) IV core members have full time jobs and spouses and are working pro-bono for the good of everyone and money collected is also coming in slowly and thorugh the IV members themselves.
These 2 facts mean that both time and money is at a premium and they have to spend it solving the problem they originally started to solve. Believe me, some of the core members themselves are stuck with the FBI name check issue for the past 2 years or so.
Given all these facts, you have to understand where IV and it's mission/policy stands. To my understanding the policy is "One step at a time".
more...
BharatPremi
12-09 03:19 PM
If you dont have an answer to the question asked dont reply and dont advise what people should do....
keep that to your kids and good luck with that....
I just check oxford dictionary to make sure whether I screwed somewhere but what I found is it was request to dollar500 from my side. It was not a advise. Rather you are advising me not to advise.. Is not it contradictory?
And if at all poster might have felt bad about my request s/he should have replied my post. Why on earth you wanted to jump in?
keep that to your kids and good luck with that....
I just check oxford dictionary to make sure whether I screwed somewhere but what I found is it was request to dollar500 from my side. It was not a advise. Rather you are advising me not to advise.. Is not it contradictory?
And if at all poster might have felt bad about my request s/he should have replied my post. Why on earth you wanted to jump in?
hot Wwe+rated+rko+wallpaper
roseball
08-19 09:06 AM
Thank you all for your suggestions and they are helpful.
I would wait for one or two months for the next FY visa bulletins and decide on starting my new labour in EB2.
Thank you again.
If your current/future job is eligible for EB-2, you have the qualifications to meet the job requirement and your employer is willing to start EB-2 process, I would get the process started as soon as possible. With your current EB-3 PD, I dont see anything changing in the next 1 to 2 months. You might as well start it now so you can complete the PERM documentation and advertising phase and file PERM in 2-3 months duration instead of waiting. Thats my 2 cents.
I would wait for one or two months for the next FY visa bulletins and decide on starting my new labour in EB2.
Thank you again.
If your current/future job is eligible for EB-2, you have the qualifications to meet the job requirement and your employer is willing to start EB-2 process, I would get the process started as soon as possible. With your current EB-3 PD, I dont see anything changing in the next 1 to 2 months. You might as well start it now so you can complete the PERM documentation and advertising phase and file PERM in 2-3 months duration instead of waiting. Thats my 2 cents.
more...
house randy orton
nandakumar
04-04 03:05 PM
I really appriciate the work of the core members.
i actively particiapted in the tech workers yahoo group, irrespective of hard work by many it failed to make a huge impact, probably because of lack of clear leadership & focus but in the case of IV, the core team's active role and leadership makes our voice being heard in the media and in the US congress.
Thanks a lot.
i actively particiapted in the tech workers yahoo group, irrespective of hard work by many it failed to make a huge impact, probably because of lack of clear leadership & focus but in the case of IV, the core team's active role and leadership makes our voice being heard in the media and in the US congress.
Thanks a lot.
tattoo ::: Randy Orton ::: Randy
Lasantha
02-21 01:11 PM
Did you mean for EB3 ROW? One year? I am not so sure. Couple of months maybe...
With the new rule on FBI name checks, a potential 47K with current PDs could get their GS's soon. I wonder how much of a shift we will see in the PD's from now, after the 47K is not taken into account. I would predict a minimum of atleast a year jump, or am I being optimistic. :confused:
With the new rule on FBI name checks, a potential 47K with current PDs could get their GS's soon. I wonder how much of a shift we will see in the PD's from now, after the 47K is not taken into account. I would predict a minimum of atleast a year jump, or am I being optimistic. :confused:
more...
pictures Randy Orton (R.K.O)#39;s Notes
![randy orton rko. Randy Orton - RKO [HD] - izle](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_veYpe_H-JZ3Pw1u_AUxwmNUxwU1Twmaa1RLgkB_Uvw4gFwVEeuqMFCKa2obn5v_rMf4up6tsoz5zPKdd80oeby_IN7NPblYiOjWyQSIcmV1_LEGSGMCbqyMcMMjT-mvPTtWbPZZv7rnVy6mMonK2sHrHTKiy165GH1atAFA5ufULLy8bgT6AhMGRGXRaXC=s0-d "Randy Orton - RKO [HD] - izle")
anilnag
11-07 08:21 PM
I don't think there is any problem in EAD approval if you go out of country after filing it. I left USA the very next day of filing I-485. Still out of USA (in Canada). I already got my EAD and am waiting for AP. My attorney also said that for filing EAD, AP, 485 I must be physically present in USA.
Just to be safe maintain your H-1B status in case there is any issue with AP (because of what murthy's firm told). I can update on my AP status as soon as I hear something.
Just to be safe maintain your H-1B status in case there is any issue with AP (because of what murthy's firm told). I can update on my AP status as soon as I hear something.
dresses Randy Orton RKO on evolution.flv. 3:50. Randy Orton as visious as ever!
.jpg "Randy+orton+rko+logo")
vjkypally
02-07 11:27 AM
I just called and they told that my employer should write to Vermont Service Center.Yes, this is not falling in place with their processing dates. But i think, you should be getting your approval any time. May be, have your attorney contact Vermont center for inquiry. Or you can call the customer service directly.
more...
makeup Randy Orton - Legacy, Randy
pappu
07-18 02:53 PM
Thanks. You joined recently. we already have such issues and more on the radar and try to find opportunities to push whatever possible. The next action item and plan is posted ion another thread. As we have more information available for our members we will post on the site.
girlfriend Randy Orton RKO against Wad
janey6152
June 8th, 2004, 06:41 PM
Thanks all
I think i'll get the Nikon D70
I think i'll get the Nikon D70
hairstyles Randy Orton RKO#39;s Batista At
ashwin_27
04-28 12:43 PM
There are several studies but this recent one I found was interesting and I recently posted about this as well.
This is from the 2010 Annual Report of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
Check out page 12/13 -
An interesting 2000 study showed that a selective immigration policy that admitted 1.6 million high-skilled immigrants age 40�44 years old annually into a hypothetical U.S.-style economy with a 50 percent debt-to-GDP ratio would have balanced the budget within five years and eventually eliminated the national debt.
This is from the 2010 Annual Report of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
Check out page 12/13 -
An interesting 2000 study showed that a selective immigration policy that admitted 1.6 million high-skilled immigrants age 40�44 years old annually into a hypothetical U.S.-style economy with a 50 percent debt-to-GDP ratio would have balanced the budget within five years and eventually eliminated the national debt.
ck_b2001
08-26 04:56 PM
Friends I think a great injustice is being done to NSC filers , their applications are taking months for ead and ap, while TSC filers are getting ead adn AP as soon as they get receipt, do you think this will improve for NSC in future, at this time looks like august NSC filers will haveto wait till the end of the year for EAD,ap, which is sad.
I would not mind getting EAD few weeks late and prefered to have reciept notice recieved instead. I filed Jul 2nd at TSC and no news yet about Reciept, CC, EAD, AP. Most July 2 filer at NSC got their reciepts 2 weeks ago.
There may be 1% chance of 485 being rejected and that is pretty scary. Easly NSC filers can atleast put their mind at rest for 485 acceptance.
I would not mind getting EAD few weeks late and prefered to have reciept notice recieved instead. I filed Jul 2nd at TSC and no news yet about Reciept, CC, EAD, AP. Most July 2 filer at NSC got their reciepts 2 weeks ago.
There may be 1% chance of 485 being rejected and that is pretty scary. Easly NSC filers can atleast put their mind at rest for 485 acceptance.
rajubuthi
08-17 08:07 PM
Gurus,
Sorry for not mentioning in my first post earlier... Just now I received a copy of the Letter which my company received from the USCIS. It is mentioned as "NOTICE OF INTENT TO DENY (NOID)".
Reasons:
- Section 203(b)(2)(A) of the Act states
- 8 C.F.R 204.5(I)(3)(ii)(C)
These are related to the Education for 3 yrs degree..
- What is the next step ?
- What is the chance of a positive result?
Thank you,
Regds,
Raju
Sorry for not mentioning in my first post earlier... Just now I received a copy of the Letter which my company received from the USCIS. It is mentioned as "NOTICE OF INTENT TO DENY (NOID)".
Reasons:
- Section 203(b)(2)(A) of the Act states
- 8 C.F.R 204.5(I)(3)(ii)(C)
These are related to the Education for 3 yrs degree..
- What is the next step ?
- What is the chance of a positive result?
Thank you,
Regds,
Raju
